Does a refractor spotting scope produce a better image than a catadioptric scope? - catadioptric scope not a good choice
In my humble opinion
I prefer to use a telescope to a rod and a whole range retroreflector locations (eg Schmidt-Cassagrain for the central area. In addition, an application catadobptric assistant would build (much more expensive and thus more expensive to purchase) for a simple framework of the observer of refraction.
Tuesday, November 10, 2009
Catadioptric Scope Not A Good Choice Does A Refractor Spotting Scope Produce A Better Image Than A Catadioptric Scope?
2 comments:
It depends, but I would say that about the same amount of money a that retro-production, a better picture. The reason is, by nature, a chromatic aberration, Refractor, unless you use the expensive glass. Probably the best parts catadioptric monitoring. Maksutov-Cassegrain telescopes built by Questar
Cats. Meade ETX telescopes including Maksutovs.
I prefer refractors as spotting areas and smaller fields of view increases with larger audiences than reflectors. Spotting Strong growth is generally very blurry images caused by atmospheric turbulence.
Post a Comment